Friday, December 27, 2019

Bits: What 5 Billion Means to Amazon

The e-commerce giant must track vast amounts of daily changes to its product listings.
An Amazon warehouse in Eastvale, Calif. The company fields five billion requests a day to edit details about products sold on its site by outside merchants.Philip Cheung for The New York Times

Each week, we review the week’s news, offering analysis about the most important developments in the tech industry.

Hi, This is Karen Weise, the tech correspondent for The New York Times in Seattle. Since the holiday shopping season is ending, it’s not a bad time to talk about Amazon.

Let me start with a single, large number critical to the shopping experience on Amazon: five billion. Each day, Amazon gets five billion submissions to edit descriptions and details about the products for sale on its site. The edits come from the companies that fill Amazon’s Everything Store.

That’s 1.8 trillion edits a year that Amazon needs to sort through. Are they accurate or misleading? Do they follow Amazon’s rules or even the law?

Some of the edits are simple updates to a product, or a company trying out new marketing. Others are tactics used to sabotage a competitor’s products or add a certification, like Food and Drug Administration approval, that an item does not have.

If shopping on Amazon can feel a little chaotic — duplicate listings, weird variations, descriptions that don’t quite match a product — this daily edit is a big reason.

I learned the importance of five billion from Amazon when I was reporting on what has happened in the two decades since Amazon began letting outside companies list goods on its site. The move sharply increased the selection customers can find when they type in Amazon.com, and now about 60 percent of Amazon’s sales come from these outside merchants.

ADVERTISEMENT

My article detailed how Amazon has squeezed more out of these suppliers over the years, making Amazon’s services, like advertising and fulfillment, essential to succeeding on the site, often in ways that make it harder to do business elsewhere.

I heard so much about how companies scramble to respond when Amazon changes its rules, which it does to present customers with a coherent, consistent experience even as the selection and number of sellers have grown so large.

Amazon’s decision to open its doors to outside sellers has been essential to its ability to get us almost anything in a matter of days, if not hours. It’s what lets us turn to it with the random, near stream-of-consciousness list of things that pop into our heads. Though my memory is hazy, I’m pretty sure one of my family’s first Prime Now orders came soon after my son was born: We got diapers, chocolate — and vermouth for Negronis.

Like Facebook in its effort to sort out fake news, Amazon has turned to algorithms to organize and police its site, and said it was spending $400 million a year to do so. On Thursday, the company said that it had record holiday sales and that “billions of items were ordered worldwide.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Jeff Wilke, the chief executive of Amazon’s consumer business, told me that the company’s long-term future depended on patrolling the site without harming well-meaning merchants.

“We have a strong incentive to be as accurate as possible in identifying bad actors, make very few mistakes when we’re wrong,” he said, adding that Amazon also wants to give people second chances when they make an honest mistake.

People who have worked at Amazon’s marketplace debate whether the company can build systems fast enough, and accurate enough, to keep up. Some say the gap is closing; others fear the rot may grow too fast to catch.

I find myself thinking of a conversation I had toward the beginning of the year with Juozas Kaziukenas, founder of Marketplace Pulse, a research company. “If the chaos continues, I don’t know how long a consumer will be willing to put up with it,” he said. “They are a marketplace of trust, and if you cannot trust it, the whole premise of Amazon completely evaporates.”

ADVERTISEMENT

That trust comes down to big decisions and little details, like those changes submitted five billion times a day.

Some stories you shouldn’t miss

  • It’s the end of an Uber era. The ride-hailing company’s founder, Travis Kalanick, stepped down from its board after weeks of selling down his stake in Uber stock.
  • Delivery, at a cost. Amazon is adding to its army of delivery drivers in a way that puts a priority on speed and cost over safety, ProPublica and BuzzFeed News found, citing internal documents and interviews. Amazon said that safety was a top priority and that last year it invested $55 million in “safety improvement projects.”
  • When a chat app is a tool for spying. ToTok, a popular messaging app, is secretly a surveillance tool run by the government of the United Arab Emirates, Mark Mazzetti, Nicole Perlroth and Ronen Bergman found. This was not a hack, but by design: Companies affiliated with Emirati intelligence created the app. (The Emirati government declined to comment for the article.)
  • R.I.P., “Antennagate.” The 2010 iPhone’s struggle to make calls was No. 42 in The Verge’s list of the top 84 tech flops of the decade. No. 1 was Ajit Pai, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, who undid net neutrality.

MORE STORIES YOU SHOULDN’T MISS

 
 
 
 

How are we doing?

We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to bits_newsletter@nytimes.com.

Like this email?

Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Bits from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

|

Connect with us on:

twitter

Change Your Email|Privacy Policy|Contact Us

The New York Times Company

620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment