Tuesday, September 6, 2022

Opinion Today: A less sexist, more diverse version of ‘Game of Thrones’ can fly just as high

But let's not call it "woking the dragon."
Author Headshot

By Indrani Sen

Culture Editor, Opinion

I enjoy scaly C.G.I. dragons, palace intrigue and armored jousting as much as the next middle-aged Indian American mom. But I have to admit I was slightly dreading the premiere of "House of the Dragon."

As the hype grew for the prequel to HBO's wildly popular fantasy epic, "Game of Thrones," I shared the "sense of glum inevitability" about watching it that Scott Woods described in a guest essay ahead of the premiere.

I didn't hate "Game of Thrones," but with an almost entirely white cast of main characters and gratuitous full-frontal nudity, it just never really felt like it was meant for me. And I was exhausted by the idea of plunging back into the extreme brutality and rampant sexualized violence that were part of what made the series such a ubiquitous topic of conversation.

As a culture editor who has assigned more think pieces about "Game of Thrones" than I care to count, however, I also shared Woods's sense of FOMO (fear of missing out) if I skipped the show. So I dutifully tuned in. The first episode of "House of the Dragon," with its limb-chopping and a horrifically gory C-section, didn't reassure me that this would be a particularly pleasant way to spend the next 10 Sunday evenings.

But Jeff Yang argues in a recent guest essay that it's worth giving "House of the Dragon" some credit for trying to address the criticism the franchise has received for its sexist depictions of women and its valorization of whiteness. He points out that the new show has a notably more diverse cast, and while the women and girls are subjected to plenty of brutality, it's mostly played to horrify rather than to titillate. And, Yang writes, "at least the lingering camera angles and lascivious framing that were hallmarks of 'Thrones' seem to be absent."

Some critics have complained that the new show lacks some of the excitement of "Game of Thrones" and wonder whether it's a casualty of "wokeness run amok," Yang writes. But he's optimistic about Westeros in the post-#MeToo and Black Lives Matter era:

If its story continues to evolve as it has, a fantasy many of us have had could come true: that female and nonwhite fans can delight in soaring dragons and palace intrigue without feeling burned in the process.

It also makes business sense, Yang suggests, for the showrunners of "House of the Dragon" to welcome a broader base of fans (perhaps including a certain middle-aged Indian American mom). I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. For now.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Games Here is today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

Contact us If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment