On June 21, I went to see Steve Bannon at his home in Washington, D.C., before he went to prison on Monday for contempt of Congress. I went because right-wing populist parties were surging in nations across Europe. I went because it seemed possible and even probable to me that Donald Trump was going to be re-elected president. I wanted to know how today's trends looked from the perspective of somebody in the MAGA movement. I went because I wanted to have a clearer idea of what a second Trump term would look like. During our conversation, Bannon, a longtime adviser to Trump, mentioned that it was a mistake for Republicans to agree to a presidential debate in June. He predicted that President Biden would appear old and infirm during the debate. By agreeing to debate so early, Bannon reasoned, Republicans were giving the Democrats time to swap out their candidate before their convention. If Republicans had insisted on a September debate, it would have been too late. By the fall, Democrats would have had no other option but Biden. That turned out to be a pretty good prediction. Bannon's prognostications about the French right were pretty accurate as well. Marine Le Pen's party appears headed to victory in the first round of that country's parliamentary voting. On the 21st, I found Bannon's vision terrifying. I find it doubly terrifying now that Trump is much more likely, post-debate, to regain the White House and yet another country in Europe might go populist right. I hope Democrats read this interview, and I hope it focuses their minds as they try to figure out how to proceed this summer and fall. Even if your instinct is to avoid such perspectives, I urge you to reconsider. People make better electoral decisions when they directly confront those on the other side of issues — even people they find disreputable and abhorrent. Some readers might wish that I'd argued with Bannon more. But I'm a journalist before I'm a pugilist. Before I argue, I want to understand, and I want to help readers understand. I mostly asked him questions, and when I did push back, it was to help me comprehend his mode of thinking, to get him to go deeper. It's a fancy two-step, but I think it's possible to be humble and appalled at the same time. Those of us who oppose Bannon and all he stands for should be humble because most of us didn't see Trump coming and most of us didn't see Trump coming out of Jan. 6 and his felony convictions stronger than ever. Many of us didn't foresee that the populist right would be a dominant force, maybe the dominant force, in nations around the world. But those events have come to pass, so at least we should have the good sense to face unpleasant truths directly. As Bannon faces his reckoning, the rest of us must contend with an even larger reckoning in the months ahead. Programming note: The newsletter will be off Thursday, July 4, and return on Friday, July 5. Here's what we're focusing on today:
We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times. Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here. Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com. If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.
|
Tuesday, July 2, 2024
Opinion Today: David Brooks’s unsettling interview with Steve Bannon
Monday, July 1, 2024
For You: To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race
Breaking news: Supreme Court says Trump has some immunity from prosecution
BREAKING NEWS
Supreme Court Says Donald Trump Is Partly Shielded From ProsecutionThe decision may effectively delay the trial of the case against the former president on charges of plotting to subvert the 2020 election.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)