Thursday, June 23, 2022

Opinion Today: A new deal for women’s sports

50 years after Title IX passed, what have female athletes gained — and lost?
Author Headshot

By Lindsay Crouse

Opinion Writer and Producer

Growing up in the '90s, I never had to worry about whether I could play sports. Instead, the question was, "Which ones?" I did so many: softball, soccer, track. As a girl, the exhilaration of sprinting to my first home run kept me coming back for more. As a teenager, I remember being surprised when someone called me "small." I beat everyone on the field to the soccer ball, who cared about my size?

What they say about sports is true: They are genuinely empowering. This is especially true for girls, who are gearing up to spend their whole lives being judged by the rest of the world about whether they're enough: pretty enough, thin enough, likable enough. Sure, sports are still about competition. But for me, they changed the metric. Playing sports taught me that my body was more than something for other people to look at. It was mine; it was strong.

All of this was due to a piece of legislation that passed 50 years ago today: Title IX. It guaranteed girls and women the same rights to school sports enjoyed by boys. And it transformed America into the top incubator of female athletic talent in the world.

In the past 50 years, girls' participation in sports has skyrocketed. But for all its successes, Title IX was really a Pyrrhic victory, as I argue in an essay. The upsides are real, of course; I've lived them. But in my decade of reporting on gender and sports here at The Times, I have realized another, uncomfortable truth: Too often, women's sports function as a JV to men's varsity. This is the case in many arenas: funding, promotion, coverage. At their worst, girls and women's sports also mirror the challenges women face in society — they can be breeding grounds for discrimination and abuse.

In my essay, I look ahead to the next 50 years and propose a new deal for women's sports, one that is not derivative of men but based on a women-first model. What would that look like? I hope that the thoughts in this essay are just the start of a larger conversation; I'd love to hear from you about how you think sports can change to reflect the needs of women and girls.

Because Title IX may have been the best thing to happen to women's sports when it was passed 50 years ago. But now, I think the best is yet to come.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Games Here is today's Mini Crossword and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

Contact us if you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment