Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Opinion Today: How should we interpret the Trump indictment?

The charges have been revealed, but it will be months before we know how consequential they could be.
Author Headshot

By John Guida

Senior Staff Editor, Opinion

On Tuesday in New York, Donald Trump became the first former American president to be indicted. He was accused by Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, of orchestrating a hush-money scheme to help him win the presidency and then covering it up once he was in the White House.

Trump pleaded not guilty in the case, which has kept opinion writers and editors on edge for weeks because it was cloaked in a compelling mystery: What is the charge, and how strong is it?

Reports held out the possibility that the case could present a novel or unusual legal theory.

But in a guest essay, Karen Friedman Agnifilo and Norman Eisen write that "there's nothing novel or weak about this case." In fact, they write, "The books and records counts laid out in the charging papers against Mr. Trump are the bread and butter of the D.A.'s office."

The creation of phony documentation to cover up campaign finance violations has been repeatedly prosecuted in New York — the type of case they see as having a strong potential for success.

David Firestone, a member of the Times editorial board, was also impressed. He writes that the charges "turned out to be more significant and more sweeping than previously suspected."

"It's still not a slam-dunk case," he admits. But the charges are "hardly novel ones" for the Manhattan district attorney's office, "which is used to prosecuting business record cases, and are far from the one-off political persecution that Republicans are claiming it to be."

But the Times columnist Michelle Goldberg had a different reaction.

"For all the hype going into Tuesday, the indictment feels anticlimactic," she writes. And Trump "may still wriggle out of this predicament."

The judge ruled that Trump will have to appear in person for a pretrial hearing in December. We have a long time to debate and explore the details to sort out if it is novel or commonplace, strong or piffling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that help readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Opinion Today, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment