Saturday, June 29, 2024

Opinion Today: In the United States, gay marriage was a missed opportunity

Modest framing created an opening for a backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. equality.
Opinion Today

June 29, 2024

A wedding ring depicted as a target, with many arrows missing the mark.
Igor Bastidas

By Omar G. Encarnación

Mr. Encarnación is a professor of politics at Bard College.

Nine years ago, when the Supreme Court enshrined same-sex marriage as a national right, President Barack Obama celebrated the ruling by remarking that progress "often comes in small increments, sometimes two steps forward, one step back." But his words also were an inadvertent warning. While in some countries the legalization of gay marriage has ushered in a new era of L.G.B.T.Q. equality and inclusion, in others — and especially in the United States — it has created an opening for new forms of discrimination and exclusion.

That's one of the major insights I came to while researching my forthcoming book "Framing Equality: The Politics of Gay Marriage Wars," an attempt to examine the politics of gay marriage through transnational lenses. At the heart of the book is the concept of "framing," shorthand for the claims and appeals made by gay activists for ending the exclusion of gay and lesbian couples from the institution of marriage. I argue that how a gay marriage campaign is framed determines the strength of the backlash and the effect on L.G.B.T.Q. equality.

As I explain in my guest essay this week for Times Opinion, America's gay marriage campaign, seen from a global perspective, is notable for its very modest framing. Its core message emphasized how exclusionary marriage laws denied gay and lesbian couples benefits such as tax advantages, inheritance rights and hospital visitation privileges.

By using this modest framing, the campaign missed a major opportunity to make a more ambitious case for L.G.B.T.Q. equality, as activists did in, for example, Spain and Brazil. For the most part, the U.S. campaign did not defend the morality and dignity of homosexual relationships. Nor did it confront the Christian right on its depiction of gay marriage as a threat to the family and to religious freedom. By failing to do so, the campaign limited the transformative power of gay marriage and helped enable today's backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. rights.

READ THE FULL ESSAY HERE

A wedding ring depicted as a target, with many arrows missing the mark.

Guest Essay

America Got Gay Marriage, but It Came at a Cost

The modest campaign created an opening for today's anti-L.G.B.T.Q. backlash.

By Omar G. Encarnación

THE WEEK IN BIG IDEAS

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times.

Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Opinion Today, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings. To opt out of updates and offers sent from The Athletic, submit a request.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment